Archive for January, 2006

heading out

Tuesday, January 24th, 2006

Well, I’ve had a fab few days here in Hong Kong, and Maja, her parents and siblings have been fantastic! :) It’s about 11:00pm, I’m absolutely shattered, and now have the trip back to do. Hopefully this will mean I’ll sleep on plane and be in good sync with Sydney morning.

Bought some fun surprises, and have good non-touristy experiences to remember of HK, although I managed the obligatory Star ferry ride and shaky picture of the Island at night. ;)

Talking of night, ‘night!

Zzz

i am in hong kong

Saturday, January 21st, 2006

he said, conscious of a sharp decline in blog quality.

Eastward Ho!

Friday, January 20th, 2006

My seating

Well, I’m flying out tomorrow lunchtime. It will be my first time to Hong Kong, my first flight on Cathay Pacific, and my first few thousand airmiles on my new frequent flyer card! ;) Very first impressions of Cathay Pacific are exciting; I checked in online to discover that whereas all my previous long-haul flights had been in the format 3 seats-4/5 seats-3 seats, this one only has the aisle seat and window seats. Not sure if this is because the plane is tiny, but here’s hoping there will be much lounging room. :)

All the promise and excitement of the East is waiting for me in Hong Kong, in the form of crappy rainy weather. Of course Maja (dare-devil dramatic dancer of danger) is there to insure I have a good time.

Tally ho!

No more painful memories?

Thursday, January 19th, 2006

Recent studies by psychologists at McGill University, as part of a followup to an original study by Harvard University psychiatrist Dr. Roger Pitman, have been using a drug to reduce the emotional effect of traumatic memories. The drug - a Beta blocker known as Propranolol - reduces the strengthening effects of stress hormones on the formation of memories, and thus is being studied as a treatment for victims of traumatic events such as those suffering Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. (Associated Press, via Globeandmail.com article)

The effects of administering the drug do not to remove the memory altogether - there is not the amnesia such as in the film Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind - but instead reduce the emotional impact the memories. Perhaps surprisingly, the article does not examine the philosophical issues of seperating significant life-events from affect, though I think the use of such a drug echoes what I consider to be a serious problem in the field of Abnormal Psychology (ie Mental Illness).

Diagnosis of mental illness is not based on a concrete body of rules; in reality mental disorders are added and removed as society’s concept of what is normal changes:

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, published by the American Psychiatric Association, is the handbook used most often in diagnosing mental disorders in the United States and internationally.

[…]What is and what is not considered a mental disorder changes over time. For example, several decades ago homosexuality was commonly considered a mental disorder, and it was listed in the DSM as such. Today, homosexuality is seen by most psychologists and psychiatrists as a normal sexual orientation. (Wikipedia - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder)

A vivid illustration of the relativity of mental illness is that the guidelines for diagnosis always include disruption of either work, or a “normal” social life. God forbid we have citizens unable to work! The diagnosis for Borderline Personality Disorder mainly revolves around the occurance of “mood swings, emotional reasoning, disrupted relationships and difficulty in functioning in a way society accepts as normal”, which seems to uncannily reflect the lives of most disillusioned youth - at least those I know! The need for normalcy through pharmaceutical treatment has gone so far that more than a couple of weeks mourning is “cured” by proscribing Prozac:

[Psychiatrist Richard] Schwartz concludes drugs like Prozac can be used to enforce certain cultural behaviors, resulting in conformity. He explains a scenario where society enforces a set of cultural norms concerning the mourning period of a widow over her husband. At what point is the duration of sorrow considered to be abnormal, and, consequently, requiring treatment? […]Certain societies have certain expectations. If a person violates the established pattern, then the society considers him “ill” and that he needs treatment. (From a paper on the prevalence of Prozac use, “Perpetually Prozac”, Matt Tsou)

And even the drug used in this particular study is being considered for more questionable benefits; Propranolol is being tested for stage fright.

The psychological explication of memory formation used as a basis for the recent studies mirrors a philosophical perspective on subject formation (ie. formation of a sense of a coherent self). While psychologists describe a re-evaluation of memories at the point of remembrance, some philosophers talk of Self as a constantly changing coherent narrative, built from retrospective rationalisation of ones past actions.

“Each time you retrieve a memory it must be restored,” he said. “When you activate a memory in the presence of a drug that prevents the restorage of the memory, the next day the memory is not as accessible.”

The effects of sabotaging this process of self-formation are potentially devastating to one’s self-knowledge. Indeed Leon Kass, Chairman of the US President’s Council on Bioethics considers it unhealthy, stating that painful memories serve a purpose and are part of the human experience. While traumatic experiences such as rape or warfare can be profoundly devistating themselves, there is certainly much need for debate lest the current trend towards a mediacated “normal” population is realised. As is recently very common, parallels can be drawn with certain distopian scenarios such as the use of Soma in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World

America’s “Free Speech Zones”

Thursday, January 19th, 2006

Free Speech Zone

I’ve only recently heard about enforced “Free Speech Zones” or “Protest Zones” set up for city visits by President Bush and other high-level officials; The Secret Service is instructing local police to arrest any protester who will not move into the designated zone - typically a closed in pen out of sight of the motorcade. Of course this keeps signs of dissent away from both the President and the accompanying media.

The American Civil Liberties Group is in the process of legal action to obtain an injuction against the Secret Service, as well as many many other issues of civil liberties in America. Their website features a vast survey of alleged rights violations by the Bush administration, and is well worth a look.

Christmas Creativity

Monday, January 9th, 2006

Sailing boat

Well thankfully these last few weeks haven’t been totally bankrupt and bereft of creative output. I managed to make a few nice “personal touch” style Christmas presents. :) The picture above is an ink on paper sailing boat I painted for my Dad.

I have a few more pictures to add, so watch this space for additions. In the meantime, if you are so inclined, check out the Flickr set.

Videogame journalism

Sunday, January 8th, 2006

sucks. It’s true, and I hadn’t realised until reading a self-confession of past sins be a videogame journo.

This new generation of irresponsible 30-something children probably don’t mind, but videogames are as much a potentially powerful, serious and effective artistic medium as comics and anime. It took a long time for this to be realised with the other two, but a good start would be constructive and genre-advancing critique.

Of course there is solid and favoured place for pure and simple fun in videogames as well, but a preview and review system that fears advertiser pull-out and loss of promo material does nothing more than form part of the marketing department of the producers.

Similarly - and no doubt far more serious - is the issue of advertiser control of newspaper and magazine content. I don’t have enough reighteous and idealistic fervor to preach against it at the moment, but hopefully mentioning it here will keep everyone mindful of the harsh realities of our Fourth Estate.

ExplodingDog

Sunday, January 8th, 2006

explodingdog

I’ve refound something that makes me happy!
explodingdog. Go there and see! :)

more ominous signs

Friday, January 6th, 2006

Quickly, here are two articles that seem to foreshadow the future of “anti-terrorist”* government activity.

  • Data mining (with public online user data): Finding subversives through their Amazon profiles. Showing how easy it is to effectively use data mining without any sophisticated technology or restricted database access. Governments have shifted their perception of risk to a model of biopower, where all citizens exist within a matrix of potential as “terrorists”. England’s attempt at, and America and Australia’s successful implimentation of Control Orders - allowing detention and “control” of “persons of interest” without the need for a crime having been commited - rely on an Foucaultian surveilance on a massive scale. Seeing what it is possible to achieve using publicly available information, one must realise the full extent and power of a system that intergrates databases of extremely sensitive personal information.

    However, with regards to the effectiveness of this surveilance on stopping terrorism, it must also be noted that we are the authors of our own trail of information. With some knowledge of the nature of information systems, we can choose to influence or confound the data-mining process. The most likely people to do this will be resourceful and sophisticated subversive groups; the London bombers all had completely clean histories. Aside: Of course for control of political subversion, and in conjunction with the anti-sedition law of Australia, this sort of thing is quite useful at finding and charging incisively critical individuals.

  • fMRI used for lie detection. In the near future the security institutions of the world will be using fMRI.

* I don’t think that it would be unfair to make “anti-terrorist” synonymous with “invasive, totalitarian”, although I’m sure there is a huge slice of the world that is still coerced by such rhetorical discourse.